Indolent
Context: On Laziness, read in class
My guess: lazy
Definition: having or showing a disposition to avoid exertion; slothful
Own Sentence: The indolent child slept all day, rather than completing their homework or cleaning their room
Mnemonic Device: sounds kind of like "idle," which is to not move
Quibble
Context: On Laziness, read in class
My guess: nonsense
Definition: an instance of the use of ambiguous prevaricating, or irrelevant language or arguments to evade a point at issue
Example: You can quibble about beginnings, middles and ends, but what we're talking about is over a year ago. (Shrum)
Connotation: Neutral
Braggadocious
Context: Political debate, via Donald Trump
My guess: cocky
Definition: empty boasting, bragging, a boasting person
History: Comes from Braggadocio, who was a boastful character in Spenser's Faerie Queen in 1590
Own Sentence: It sounds braggadocious, but I don't think I ever dropped a pass in a game.
Promenade
Context: The Myth of the Latin Woman
My guess: a walk
Definition: take a leisurely walk, ride, or drive in public
Mnemonic Device: Promenade in French translates to literally "walk yourself"
Connotation: Neutral
Perpetuated
Context: The Myth of the Latin Woman
My guess: to create
Definition: to make (something typically an undesirable situation or unfounded belief) continue
Own Sentence: He perpetuated the idea that their house was haunted.
History: Latin perpetuatus, first known use was in 1530
Scintillating
Context: Comic at the end of assignment sheet
My guess: ridiculous
Definition: very clever, amusing, and interesting
Own Sentence: The show was very scintillating, making my laugh several times.
Example: The cognoscenti would never find my progenitors mildly scintillating (Wilkinson)
Phobos
Guess: afraid
Dictionary: fear
Words: Homophobia, claustrophobic, pedophobia, arachnophobia, phobia
Remember: The dogs are afraid of the phone ringing, think "pho"
Demos
Guess: example
Dictionary: the common people of an ancient Greek state
Words: Demonstration, demarch, demagogue, democracy, demography
Remember: Democracy is a government run by the people
Dormio
Guess: Tired
Definition: sleep
Words: Dormant, dormitory, dormouse, dormitive, dormition
Remember: Dormir in French means "to sleep"
Annus
Guess: planet
Definition: year
Words: Annual, anniversary, millennial, annals, annuity
Remember: That scene in Wall-E when they celebrate the seventh centennial thing in a cup for being in space for 700 years
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Sunday, September 25, 2016
TOW #3
Reagan's Challenger Address
On January 28th, 1986, the Challenger exploded in flight. President Ronald Reagan was given the responsibility of telling the nation what had happened instead of giving his State of the Union address. He begins the speech by saying, "Today is a day for mourning and remembering. Nancy and I are pained to the core by the tragedy of the shuttle Challenger. We know we share this pain with all of the people of our country. This is truly a national loss." It is important that he does because the use of 'we,' 'our,' and 'national loss' groups the entire country together, uniting everyone. This emphasizes the fact all of America is experiencing this tragedy together, and unifies the country as one.
Something else that Reagan does is appeal to pathos. He addresses "the schoolchildren of America who were watching the live coverage of the shuttle's take-off," and says, "the future doesn't belong to the fainthearted; it belongs to the brave." He uses this opportunity to try to empower the young children who were watching the as Challenger exploded. It shows that even in times of despair, our country is always advancing and we are a nation full of brave citizens. This helps to relieve some of the sadness that the Americans were feeling as they focus on the bright side of what had happened.
Reagan gives this speech because he wants to assure the country that we can get over obstacles such as these in the name of scientific advancement. He wants to prove to not only Americans, but to countries around the world that casualties like these will never stop us from improving and bettering ourselves. He does this well because of the way he unifies the country and appeals to pathos through his addressing the children of America.
On January 28th, 1986, the Challenger exploded in flight. President Ronald Reagan was given the responsibility of telling the nation what had happened instead of giving his State of the Union address. He begins the speech by saying, "Today is a day for mourning and remembering. Nancy and I are pained to the core by the tragedy of the shuttle Challenger. We know we share this pain with all of the people of our country. This is truly a national loss." It is important that he does because the use of 'we,' 'our,' and 'national loss' groups the entire country together, uniting everyone. This emphasizes the fact all of America is experiencing this tragedy together, and unifies the country as one.
Something else that Reagan does is appeal to pathos. He addresses "the schoolchildren of America who were watching the live coverage of the shuttle's take-off," and says, "the future doesn't belong to the fainthearted; it belongs to the brave." He uses this opportunity to try to empower the young children who were watching the as Challenger exploded. It shows that even in times of despair, our country is always advancing and we are a nation full of brave citizens. This helps to relieve some of the sadness that the Americans were feeling as they focus on the bright side of what had happened.
Reagan gives this speech because he wants to assure the country that we can get over obstacles such as these in the name of scientific advancement. He wants to prove to not only Americans, but to countries around the world that casualties like these will never stop us from improving and bettering ourselves. He does this well because of the way he unifies the country and appeals to pathos through his addressing the children of America.
Sunday, September 18, 2016
TOW #2- visual text
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezVtodzCCMM
It's common knowledge that cleaning is no fun. But with SlickX3, at least it will be easier! With NASA technology, the SlickX3 fills and seals your surfaces to prevent liquids, dirt, and even germs from getting in your countertops, sinks, and tables! This infomercial uses many techniques to successfully advertise their product. The goal is to get mothers to buy this, which is evident because the actor used is a middle aged woman, and moms are typically the ones to do the house cleaning.
This infomercial uses several techniques that make their advertisement successful. One thing that is done is the advertisers sprayed half of a surface with SlickX3 and spilled something on it. Then they filmed what it's like to wipe clean a surface with SlickX3 versus without. This visually displays how using this product makes cleaning much easier, and proves that it is worth buying the SlickX3!
Something else that this infomercial does is something that other infomercials are infamous for, which is utilizing dramatic reactions. In the SlickX3 commercial, the actress happily sweeps the other cleaning products off the counter. This emphasizes that you will be saving hundreds of dollars by buying this product, and all other cleaning products will be a waste.
The last fifteen seconds of the two minute commercial are dedicated to showcasing the product in all its glory while displaying the price. They make sure to show that by buying now, you can receive a free gift! They also make sure to show that all of this is a sixty dollar retail value, but you get it for only $19.99! This makes it seem like you are getting a great deal by buying the SlickX3.
All of these put together results in an extremely successful advertisement for what is most likely an average cleaning product. The overdramatic acting, comparisons, and vibrant prices make buying the SlickX3 almost irresistible!
It's common knowledge that cleaning is no fun. But with SlickX3, at least it will be easier! With NASA technology, the SlickX3 fills and seals your surfaces to prevent liquids, dirt, and even germs from getting in your countertops, sinks, and tables! This infomercial uses many techniques to successfully advertise their product. The goal is to get mothers to buy this, which is evident because the actor used is a middle aged woman, and moms are typically the ones to do the house cleaning.
This infomercial uses several techniques that make their advertisement successful. One thing that is done is the advertisers sprayed half of a surface with SlickX3 and spilled something on it. Then they filmed what it's like to wipe clean a surface with SlickX3 versus without. This visually displays how using this product makes cleaning much easier, and proves that it is worth buying the SlickX3!
Something else that this infomercial does is something that other infomercials are infamous for, which is utilizing dramatic reactions. In the SlickX3 commercial, the actress happily sweeps the other cleaning products off the counter. This emphasizes that you will be saving hundreds of dollars by buying this product, and all other cleaning products will be a waste.
The last fifteen seconds of the two minute commercial are dedicated to showcasing the product in all its glory while displaying the price. They make sure to show that by buying now, you can receive a free gift! They also make sure to show that all of this is a sixty dollar retail value, but you get it for only $19.99! This makes it seem like you are getting a great deal by buying the SlickX3.
All of these put together results in an extremely successful advertisement for what is most likely an average cleaning product. The overdramatic acting, comparisons, and vibrant prices make buying the SlickX3 almost irresistible!
Sunday, September 11, 2016
TOW #1
Article: 'Blair Witch': Shaky Cams That Left Audiences Shaking
(http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/11/movies/blair-witch-shaky-cams-that-left-audiences-shaking.html?)
On September 16, the new Blair Witch film is to be released to theaters, hoping to draw in a new audience and put a modern twist on the classic "The Blair Witch Project." Marc Spitz uses this opportunity to reflect on the original film and the reasons for its success.
Spitz wants to show the world why "The Blair Witch Project" gained such popularity, gaining almost a quarter of a billion dollars since its release. Spitz writes, "The gothic nature of “The Blair Witch Project” seemed a bracing counterpoint to the modernity that marked much of American culture at the turn of the millennium. In an increasingly digital world, the feeling of something authentically creepy proved irresistible." He argues that the simplicity of the film (due to the directors' lack of money and connections) set it aside from previous horror movies. Most of the others had resorted to gore and violence to scare their audiences, while The Blair Witch used shaky cameras and realism to invoke fear.
Spitz writes to those who are planning on seeing the new "Blair Witch." He says, "What the new one cannot possibly do is replicate the shock of the original’s success or the collective goose bumps it seemed to produce that pivotal summer when it became a pop-cultural phenomenon and changed the way horror films were made." This is his way of preparing the audience for what surely cannot top the original. He then goes on to explain why the new film will never be able to compete with the success of the old one.
Something important that Spitz does it utilize quotes from the directors of "The Blair Witch Project." This allows his audience to truly understand what made them unique. One example is, "Mr. Sánchez said: 'It was a total experiment, a 24-hour-a-day shoot. There were a lot of times where we were literally eating somewhere, and the actors were still in the woods shooting.'" The inclusion of this quote shows how casual the filming atmosphere was, something that wasn't usual for horror films. It also shows that most of the film was up to the actors, with little to no direction from the directors. One can credit the success of the movie to this natural unfolding.
While no one expects "Blair Witch" to be nearly as good as is predecessor, it's nice to reflect on the impact "The Blair Witch Project" has made on the horror film genre, and what has been made because of it.
(http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/11/movies/blair-witch-shaky-cams-that-left-audiences-shaking.html?)
On September 16, the new Blair Witch film is to be released to theaters, hoping to draw in a new audience and put a modern twist on the classic "The Blair Witch Project." Marc Spitz uses this opportunity to reflect on the original film and the reasons for its success.
Spitz wants to show the world why "The Blair Witch Project" gained such popularity, gaining almost a quarter of a billion dollars since its release. Spitz writes, "The gothic nature of “The Blair Witch Project” seemed a bracing counterpoint to the modernity that marked much of American culture at the turn of the millennium. In an increasingly digital world, the feeling of something authentically creepy proved irresistible." He argues that the simplicity of the film (due to the directors' lack of money and connections) set it aside from previous horror movies. Most of the others had resorted to gore and violence to scare their audiences, while The Blair Witch used shaky cameras and realism to invoke fear.
Spitz writes to those who are planning on seeing the new "Blair Witch." He says, "What the new one cannot possibly do is replicate the shock of the original’s success or the collective goose bumps it seemed to produce that pivotal summer when it became a pop-cultural phenomenon and changed the way horror films were made." This is his way of preparing the audience for what surely cannot top the original. He then goes on to explain why the new film will never be able to compete with the success of the old one.
Something important that Spitz does it utilize quotes from the directors of "The Blair Witch Project." This allows his audience to truly understand what made them unique. One example is, "Mr. Sánchez said: 'It was a total experiment, a 24-hour-a-day shoot. There were a lot of times where we were literally eating somewhere, and the actors were still in the woods shooting.'" The inclusion of this quote shows how casual the filming atmosphere was, something that wasn't usual for horror films. It also shows that most of the film was up to the actors, with little to no direction from the directors. One can credit the success of the movie to this natural unfolding.
While no one expects "Blair Witch" to be nearly as good as is predecessor, it's nice to reflect on the impact "The Blair Witch Project" has made on the horror film genre, and what has been made because of it.
Tuesday, September 6, 2016
IRB Intro
The book that I have chosen to read is Picking Cotton by Jennifer Thompson-Cannino and Ronald Cotton. My mom is the one who recommended it to me, she said that it is very good. I trust my mother. So I shall read it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)